Key takeaway
What This Development Means
EPA’s withdrawal of the proposed SNURs for 18 plastic-derived substances marks a significant shift in chemical regulation. While reducing short-term compliance burdens, it signals the importance of closely monitoring evolving TSCA actions and potential future restrictions tied to plastic waste feedstocks.
What are SNURs and why were they proposed for these 18 substances?
Significant New Use Rules (SNURs) under TSCA require notification before new applications of certain chemicals. These SNURs were proposed due to potential contamination risks in plastic waste-derived substances, especially for use in fuels.
How does this SNUR withdrawal affect compliance obligations?
With the SNURs withdrawn, companies no longer need to submit prior EPA notification for these 18 substances. However, vigilance is essential—future regulatory changes may still occur if manufacturing or environmental concerns arise.
Source basis: https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OPPT-2023-0245-0001
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has officially withdrawn proposed Significant New Use Rules (SNURs) for 18 chemical substances derived from plastic waste. The decision, announced on 9 July 2025, affects companies across the chemicals value chain by reversing a 2023 policy direction that would have required prior EPA notification before new uses of these substances commenced.
The proposed SNURs—initially published in June 2023 under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)—targeted chemicals intended for use in transportation fuels and similar applications. The rules were withdrawn following legal challenges and public feedback, which prompted the EPA to also revoke the underpinning TSCA Section 5(e) Order in December 2024. As the manufacture of the substances had not yet begun, the agency determined that further regulation was unwarranted at this stage.
Background: From Restriction To Withdrawal
The 18 substances in question were originally assessed by EPA due to concerns around potential contaminants in pyrolysis-derived feedstocks, including heavy metals, dioxins, PFAS, and other persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic chemicals. The SNURs would have required a 90-day advance notice to the EPA prior to any significant new use, allowing the agency time to evaluate associated risks.
The EPA’s reversal comes after comments from industry stakeholders and environmental groups raised questions about the technical basis and feasibility of the proposed restrictions. Legal action further challenged the enforceability of the TSCA Section 5(e) Order. The agency ultimately decided that, without active manufacturing or evidence of risk, maintaining the SNURs was unnecessary.
Related Articles
EPA Draft 1,2-Dichloropropane Evaluation Finds Unreasonable Risk Across 14 Conditions Of Use
EPA preliminarily finds that 14 of 15 assessed 1,2-dichloropropane conditions of use significantly contribute to unreasonable risk, including worker and consumer exposures.
EPA draft trans-1,2-dichloroethylene evaluation finds unreasonable worker risk
EPA's draft trans-DCE evaluation finds unreasonable risk for some uses, but it does not yet impose new risk-management controls.
EPA Opens New Rulemaking Path For Carbon Tetrachloride TSCA Amendments
EPA is considering changes to its December 2024 carbon tetrachloride rule while current controls and compliance dates remain the legal baseline.
