PPWR self-assessment

Start now
Skip to the heatmaps

Aerospace & Defence · 16 September 2026

Substances Under Pressure

Explore where 21 aerospace and defence substances face regulatory pressure across EU-level and US federal law. Three heatmaps show what applies now, what could change next and where regulation creates pressure to investigate substitution, with evidence behind every signal.

01 / Define the work

Start with your substance list

Set the scope with the Assistant, then follow the research through to review.

  1. 1 Set the scope
  2. 2 Follow the research
  3. 3 Explore the results
Foresight AssistantNew research project
You

Build a regulatory-pressure heat map for the substances in our aerospace and defence portfolio.

Portfolio substances · 21 substances
Foresight Assistant

Which markets should I cover?

You

EU-level and US federal law.

Foresight Assistant

I’ll research each substance in both markets, compile the evidence and check the findings before they go to a person for review.

Research project

Aerospace & defence substance outlook

21 substances · 2 markets · 42 research workflows

Follow the research

Illustrative Assistant experience. Research progress is simulated.

02 / Follow the research

Follow the research across substances and markets

Open a cell to see how evidence is gathered, checked and prepared for human review.

Aerospace & defence substance outlook

21 substances · 2 markets

Illustrative workflow
42 working0 ready for review
Illustrative substance research progress by market
Substance / CAS European Union US federal
Chromium trioxideCAS 1333-82-0
1-Bromopropane (1-BP)CAS 106-94-5
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP)CAS 117-81-7
CadmiumCAS 7440-43-9
Boric acidCAS 10043-35-3

These are example workflow states, not approval records for the published research.

Explore the results

03 / Explore the research

Explore the regulatory outlook

21 substances · EU-level & US federal · Published 16 September 2026 · Not maintained

Current rules and future changes

Compare current rules, confirmed changes and potential changes across EU-level and US federal law.

Potential impact

21 of 21 substances

  • 1 · Minor administration
  • 2 · Information duties
  • 3 · Significant controls
  • 4 · Major process change
  • 5 · Potential use loss
  • No mapped change
  • Current context
Regulatory transition. Published 16 September 2026.
SubstanceEuropean UnionUS federal
Current positionConfirmed changesPotential changesCurrent positionConfirmed changesPotential changes
Chromium trioxideCAS 1333-82-0
1-Bromopropane (1-BP)CAS 106-94-5
1-Methyl-2-pyrrolidoneCAS 872-50-4
1,2-Benzisothiazolin-3-one (BIT)CAS 2634-33-5
1,4-DioxaneCAS 123-91-1
2-MethoxyethanolCAS 109-86-4
HFPO-DA (GenX acid)CAS 13252-13-6
6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonic acid (6 FTS)CAS 27619-97-2
4,4'-Methylenediphenyl diisocyanateCAS 101-68-8
Alkanes, C10-13, chloro (SCCPs)CAS 85535-84-8
Asbestos FibresCAS 1332-21-4
Beryllium (Be)CAS 7440-41-7
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP)CAS 117-81-7
Bis(pentabromophenyl) ether (decaBDE)CAS 1163-19-5
Boric acidCAS 10043-35-3
Bromochlorodifluoromethane (Halon 1211)CAS 353-59-3
Bromotrifluoromethane (Halon 1301)CAS 75-63-8
CadmiumCAS 7440-43-9
Cadmium oxideCAS 1306-19-0
Carbon tetrachlorideCAS 56-23-5
Chromium (VI)CAS 18540-29-9

Want to explore the sources, timelines and methodology behind the map?

Discuss your substance list with our team

Share the substances that matter to your programmes. We’ll discuss the relevant regulatory developments, review the evidence and identify questions that need further assessment.

orBook a demo

We’ll be in The Hague for the IAEG Fall 2026 meeting. Come and say hello.

About this research

This is a fixed snapshot and is not maintained. Actual company exposure, authorisation coverage and substitution feasibility require a separate assessment.